An abundance of the good and the beautiful to close out this (south of the border) Thanksgiving Day, so much so that I'm having a hard time deciding just where to begin...With a deftly turned phrase by an excellent writer? Or with a breath-stealing photo of a sexy man? Decisions, decisions.
I choose him both ways:

The first few eager snowflakes have dusted my front step. The icing on the Cake; Winter is here. - Alan's most recent journal entry
And because encore peformances of the Wonderful are always desirable:

That's what I call having my cake (and the icing) and eating it too.
***********************************************************************************************************************************
This is going to be a big entry - way more photos that I should probably put in one entry and it make take some time for them all to load - but I want to wrap up the first Vancouver casino show and (finally) try to answer a point that I've been pondering for awhile about the upcoming Grey Cup Festival show. In the past few days of pondering, both Alan and Bob have made comments in their respective journals that are part and parcel of my own response to that point, and I am running out of time to make that response if I don't want it to be an after-the-fact, 20-20 hindsight sort of answer. And I want to say my own piece on the "body image" topic too. Then there's wanting to respond to the rest of Alan's journal entry. I think I'll save that for the very end, thus ending and beginning with what gives the greatest pleasure...think of it as cake (again, with icing) for both appetizer and dessert. And maybe as the main course too. It's hard to have too much cake.
I think I'll go with the closeup shots from the end of the Coquitlam casino show - these are all from the encores, speaking of encore performances - and then sandwich most of the words between these and the full-size photos which are probably still trying to load. Perhaps by cleverly inserting the text between batches of lovely photos, I can take a bit of the scald off of the hot water I am likely going to get into (or is it "stay in"?) from what I say. Nobody can stay pissed when they've got cake, cake and icing, mind you...can they?
Well, it sure seems to work with me. But then, I really do love cake.
*******************************************************************************************************************************
Three from Excursion, two from Fortune, six from River Driver, and five from Rant & Roar. Then one of the face that tells the most compelling story, especially during the final seconds of a show.




*********************************************************************************************************************************
Taking a macro look at this journal, which I have been keeping for well over a year now, a couple of broad themes seem to have emerged, at least if one is judging anything by the number of comments various topics have generated: for example, the more intellectual and argumentative I am, the more people are bored and uninterested. Conversely, the more revealing the anecdote (from a GBS perspective), and the more “in character” I write, the more popular the entry. This is not really a surprise; attempts at taking ourselves seriously have never been to our advantage. To quote my friend Ken, then, “dance with the one who brung ya…”. - Bob's most recent journal entry
I fully expect to be in the decided minority - as well as up to my ear lobes in hot water - with this opinion, but I think this very well might be the saddest thing I've ever heard from Bob Hallett. Yes, it's got a heaping measure of truth in it...I'll concede that much straight up. But even with that measure of truth, I'm still going to disagree with Bob, disagree even while agreeing. Granted, that disagreement isn't fueled by anywhere near as much naive, hopeful enthusiasm as it would have been a few years ago; much of the naivete has been slapped out of me by now, quite a bit of the enthusiasm too. But not the hope; the hope abides. And some of that slapping has had the unexpected benefit of helping when it comes to seeing things a bit more clearly.
"Attempts at taking ourselves seriously have never been to our advantage": That reads like an epitaph - for a person, for a band, for a culture. I believe it's true that a great many of Great Big Sea's fans - the people who have "brung" GBS to the dance - would think this an excellent motto for their favourite Party Band. I believe it's true that a great many Canadians would have no problem at all extending that concept to cover Newfoundlanders in general.
But I do not agree that it has to be this way, not in either case; it''s certainly not justified and I can't believe it's inevitable. The one thing I am more convinced of than the inarguable and unfortunate truth that many take neither men of GBS nor the people of Newfoundland seriously is the much more compelling truth that those men and those people do so richly deserve to be taken seriously. And I also think there is likely some responsibility to be borne by those who make the choice of who will and who will not be the ones bringing them to the dance.
In this instance, Bob expresses the thought that the lack of responses to his "intellectual and argumentative" journal entries indicates that people are "bored and uninterested" with and in that type of entry; because people do respond to his "in character" entries, then this means they prefer him (and by extension, GBS) when he/they are not taking themselves seriously. All logical enough, except it fails to address the obvious question: Why? Why don't the people who are apparently reading and responding to Bob's journal want to respond to the intellectual and argumentative entries? Why is GBS in a place where taking themselves seriously would be disadvantageous?
With the journal, maybe the most pertinent question to ask might be what could happen to someone who responded in like kind to one of Bob's own "intellectual and argumentative" entries. This is a web site where it is possible to be permanently banned for no reason other than that you have made a small group of complaining people uncomfortable. This is a web site where the participants are repeatedly admonished, publicly and privately, by the hired admins - the admins hired by GBS - not to stray from being "positive". This is a web site where when someone brings up a serious topic, the response is often an unchallenged "This shouldn't be here because this is where I come to be happy".
Most of all, this is a web site that was dismembered not very long ago because the GBS band members - the guys that most fans by defintionn of the term "fan" want to suck up to and win approval from - were "appalled" at what it had become. Then those band members hired a management company that persistently treats GBS fans like particularly stunned children and strives to create an atmosphere that is for all intents and purposes cyber-cotton candy. Is it any wonder that those who do have "intellectual and argumentative" opinions - as well as those who can appreciate the same from others - have either moved along or fallen silent?
Over the past few years, the sole welcoming message sent to that kind of GBS fan online has been found in Bob's and Alan's journals. That message may be falling on hushed lips and stilled typing fingers, but I do know that it has not fallen on deaf ears and blind reading eyes. I know there are people who take Bob Hallett and Alan Doyle and Sean McCann seriously, and I know there are people who appreciate what both Bob and Alan have been writing in their journals, though it's a number that I see as more waning than waxing. Of those who do remain, there are some perfectly reasonable explanations for why they might choose to appreciate quietly, and also for why they might honestly believe that this is exactly what the men of Great Big Sea prefer for them to do.
But it's a very different tale for the telling on the rest of GBS's official site. If you wind up being brung to the dance by someone who prefers that you stay locked into a character role that you find chafing and limiting, is it necessarily because those dance dates were your only possible option, or is it perhaps at least partly because "Piss off!" messages are being sent to the ones who would be glad to take you seriously? Is getting your feet stomped on by an obliviously clumsy dance partner an intergral part of the true cost of peace at any price? There's getting what you paid for, and then there's paying for what you get.
If you - speaking now in general terms...the figurative "you" - don't give a shit about being taken seriously, then winding up in a place where that would not be to your advantage isn't much of a worry. Just stay in character and shrug off the foolish misperceptions of others. As my Dad would have said when someone was willing to pay him good money to pretend to be something he was not, Just laugh your arse off all the way to the bank. But if you - again, figuratively speaking - really do want to be taken seriously and you find yourself in a place where that truly is a disadvantageous desire, then something needs to change. I still believe such change is possible - difficult and costly, to be sure, but possible nevertheless. There's a fine line sometimes between hope and naivete.
But to want to be taken seriously about something in the midst of an environment that sets up not being serious about anything as the most desirable behavioural standard..perhaps even the only permissible behavioural standard...that's not a cake that seems likely to be both eaten and had.
Which is why I think this is the saddest thing I've heard from Bob. I'm sure there will be those who will find it Bobisciously hilarious, appropriately Bobistically jokey.
********************************************************************************************************************************
This all segues rather neatly into answering a point that Laura brought up in a comment she made on a prior entry, one I've held off on posting because I wasn't sure how to answer:
Isn't the Grey Cup shindig more of the same stuff of a bunch of people getting drunk and yelling for the same songs they've heard GBS play for the last 10 years? Same old same old, never changing, big dumb happy party time. with everything upbeat and smily. That doesn't sound so hot to me. - Laura
As I said, I've been wondering how to respond. I think there's some truth in what Laura's said, but I don't think it's all of the truth, or at least I don't believe it's necessarily all of the truth. Though I'll admit to not being thrilled by Spirit Of The West being on the bill. I've only seen them twice - once with GBS and once on their own - and even though I am reluctant to write off any band after only two shows, probably the most charitable thing I can say is that I'll keep an open mind, but what I saw at those two shows is why I never looked any further into their music. Not my cup of tea, not my kind of show, and really not my kind of crowd, not at those two shows at least. Talk about winding up in a place where taking yourself seriously is seriously disadvantageous.
So when I saw SoTW on the bill for this Grey Cup gig, it didn't reassure me very much about what this show might be like. I'd never heard of the Lowest Of The Low, and since their name unfortunately brings to mind some kind of goofy-ass spoof/cover band, I was very glad to read what Alan wrote about them in that most recent journal entry:
Looking forward to a big night in Toronto on Saturday as there should be close to 8,000 revelers at the Grey Cup gig. Spirit of the West is also on the bill, as are Lowest of the Low. For those of you who don’t know about the Low, Ron Hawkins and his tribe were one of the most critically acclaimed indie bands on the college circuit about 15 years ago. They must be reforming for this gig as I’ve not heard a peep from them in over a decade. I saw them once at a multi-band bill and they blew everyone (including GBS) completely off the stage. Their CD “Shakespeare My Butt” is one of the Top Ten Canadian Recordings of all time.
I still think it's a silly band name, but I know a lot of people who feel the same way about "Great Big Sea"; I'm just glad to find out they're legit, even impressive per Alan, and he's given me plenty of reason to trust his music/performance assessments. They even sound as if they feel free to take themselves seriously now and again. And what little I've heard about the other band that's been added to the lineup - Emerson Drive - sounds fairly reassuring too.
Which still doesn't really address Laura's main point: Yes, I'd guess that most in this crowd will come in fully expecting to hear "their" Great Big Sea, which usually translates into a wish for a setlist that parallels the Road Rage's track order song for song. And most of them will probably want the between-song talk to be all about getting drunk, being drunk, stayiing drunk, and so on, "Sociables!" up the wazoo. Given that most everyone present will have been in the building for something like 5 hours before GBS even takes the stage, chances are good that many of those present are going to be well on their own way to getting drunk, being drunk, staying drunk, and so on.
But even though it's probably going to be what I tend to call an "OBR With A DR Chaser" kind of crowd, that does not mean that GBS has to party like it's 1999. They've made some brilliant setlist choices at widely varying kinds of shows, and I've got every reason trust the Setlist Master with this show. Yes, it's the kind of atmosphere that limits your choices in some regards - I can't see them being able to do much at all by way of slower tempo songs with any real success other than the powerful a cappella numbers such as General Taylor and River Driver. But just becausae uptempo will work better, that does not mean it has to be solely the uptempo songs everyone there has heard umpteen times.
What works to limit their choices - the sheer size of the crowd - also works to expand their possibilities of creating interest in their newer tunes. Sometimes, people who only half-ass listen to GBS seem to think they haven't been putting out any new music the past few years, pretty much since frigging Road Rage; what better way to put the New GBS Music idea in thousands of minds a few months before your newest CD comes out than to blow them away with songs they didn't know you could do?
Who knows - maybe they'll decide to play it differently (and if they do, chances are excellent that iti will be the right call), but if they want to go with newer music that's big enough and bold enough to keep the attention of 8,000 mostly-inebriates, they've got the right kind of newer stuff to go with the familiar tunes: Shines Right Through, When I Am King, and maybe most of all, Straight To Hell; they could bring down the house with STH, raise a few eyebrows, open a few eyes, and maybe even shatter a few stereotypes too. Who knows - they might even get taken seriously by some for the very first time. I'd love to think they could do Walk On The Moon, but my guess is the crowd will simply be too noisy. Captain Kidd would probably go over too, as well as some others.
The main point is that within certain parameters (no way could this show be Ballad Night, or even Let's Play All Our Original Tunes Night..that's the show I really want to see someday), they can make what they choose of this show. Yes, you have to play to your audience, but that doesn't mean you necessarily have to let your audience play you; if it were what they wanted to do, they could give their crowd what it wants and then they could give that crowd more than it ever knew it wanted, more than it realised GBS had to give.
It really is a big night for them...playing for 8,000 people, a good number of those people travelling into TO from all around Canada, their first big gig in TO in nearly a year and a half, the gig taking place in that largest of Canadian CD-buying markets just a few months before their own new CD comes out. There's a lot on the line at this show, and nearly every time GBS goes into a show where there's a lot on the line, they rise to the challenge with power and authority.
And Alan will be strutting his considerable stuff up on the big stage in the Big Smoke, headlining a Grey Cup Festival gig in front of 8,000 screaming, cheering, swarming, applauding, clamouring people. This is really all I needed to respond to the comment, because this does indeed sound hot to me. It sounds positively incendiary.
*********************************************************************************************************************************
Before the rest of the Coquitlam show photos, just a few words about the notion of "body image" since that topic came up recently over on the GBS message board, with all of the expected foolishness and thoughtlessness making their customary appearances. To each their own personal tastes, and to each their own personal opinion - which means, of course, that I get my own turn at personal taste and personal opinion, the result of which is that I think this body is the perfectly beautiful image. Five perfectly beautiful images, to be exact, these from Excursion.


It's easy to take sexy pictures of Alan Doyle because he's such a sexy man; this, however, just might be the sexiest picture of all...so far, at least. I'm certainly open to raising the bar.
Five from Fortune, including another view of the Fiery Rock God photo put back in its proper order.

Seven from what was a spectacular River Driver, and another example of when the lights were done so right.
Ending with Rant & Roar, offered with passion and beauty.

Sean listens as a Vancouver crowd rants and roars.
Alan looks up into the heart of his crowd (literally into the middle of the audience with this venue's stadium seating) as they sing along with him.
Holding on to the last, lingering moments left out on stage, saying the final goodbyes of this evening. Most of us have those fleeting moments when our usual guard drops and the heart and soul of who we are shines forth clearly on our faces; this last prolonged moment on tonight's stage is one of Alan's moments of clarity.
*****************************************************************************************************************************
Last but never least, a few final comments about Alan's much-appreciated journal entry.
My Laptop is fixed!!!
I’ve missed my wee laptop. I used to think it a bit of a vice of mine. Sort of my own oversized Crackberry, but since I’ve been without it for a number of weeks, I’ve come to realize that I use this machine for more than just Internet and Emails. This has become my travel companion and my entertainment center. It serves as my mobile office and recording studio. It is my travel journal. I don’t write without it.
When I'm home, I find myself coming unglued if my poor little battered laptop gets balky, even though there's a perfectly serviceable PC just to the other side of my left elbow where I sit bitching about the malfunctioning laptop. I never write on the PC, always and solely on the laptop. It's companion-verging-on-appendage for me.
Since Alan does not write without his laptop either, it's a very good thing - good for him, even more so for those of us who love to read him - that he now has his back again.
I’ve mentioned this play before, but for those of you in the Winnipeg area, Tempting Providence, a play about a missionary nurse on the pioneering west coast of Newfoundland, plays in Winnipeg at the Prairie Theatre Exchange for the next few weeks. It is about rural Newfoundland but it could be about India or South Africa or Australia, or any where in the colonies the British Empire sent doctors and nurses.
It is a clever four person show that uses only a table and cloth for a set and it will introduce you to a Lady that you’ll never forget. It may very well be the best play I’ve ever seen."
I saw Tempting Providence at Atlantic Scene in Halifax in the Spring of 2003. It made a powerful and lasting impression on me, and, just as Alan says, those who go see it will meet a woman - a Lady - whose passion and resolve and love are as inspirational as they are unforgettable. At least, that's how it was for me. It's a remarkable play - simultaneously rich and spare, the pragmatics of the staging presenting a true and accurate reflection of reality of the narrative - about an even more remarkable woman; it may very well be the best play I've ever seen too, certainly among the Top 10.